| ReelWest
Magazine Question & Answer
Albert Brooks
In 1971, a stand-up comic named Albert Brooks wrote an Esquire article
about a non-existent school for comedians. Later, PBS hired him
to make an information commercial for the same fake school. The
show ran on the networks The Great American Dream Machine.
Brooks went from there to a season making short films for Saturday
Night Live and wrote, directed and starred in the feature film Real
Life.
Since then he has made six films of his own and has taken acting
roles in 10 other movies including the recent My First Mister, which
marked the directing debut of Christine Lahti. While promoting the
film, Brooks talked to Reel West about Saturday Night Live, the
on-set problems that arise when the director also acts and the reasons
why he became a triple threat.
How did you end up making short films for Saturday Night Live?
Actually, the show was originally going to be The Albert
Brooks Show. I told them (Lorne Michaels and executives from NBC)
that I didnt do television. They left and came back three
months later and said they didnt know what to do, but they
knew that they needed someone who was a name performer
to be involved. They asked me if I would come on and be part of
the show. They asked me what I wanted to do and I said that I was
hoping to become involved in the movie business. I asked what
if I made shorts? And they said so you will come to
New York? And I said no but they kept coming to
me because they needed me. In turn, I got a lot of publicity for
them in March before they went on (in September).
Lorne Michaels and I did this big press junket at Universal
at a time when he didnt even have his Not Ready for Prime
Time Players. I was on television all the time and so I had people
coming up to me and saying Hi, Im Bob from Dallas. What
is the show going to be about? And I said Well, I will
be doing short films. Lorne? Lorne said well, were
not sure yet. Sounds good, said Bob. Lorne went
away for the summer and he got his show together and it went on
the air with my movies. I was in L.A. safely making these short
films and as the show took off and his core got hot, I was no longer
needed. But if you go back to the archives, the rave of Saturday
Night Live in Newsweek is one page and its about one thing:
a short film I made called Super Season. I made up three shows that
were coming to NBC and Newsweek said it was a great little film.
But the review credited the Not Ready for Prime time Players. God
bless him, but Lorne never corrected them. My friend Harry Nilsson
was the only one who wrote Newsweek and said Albert Brooks
made that movie.
You are one of the few writer/directors who chooses to act in other
peoples films on a regular basis. If you could only continue
working in two of the disciplines, which one would you choose to
drop?
From Real Life I have wanted someone else to direct, but I
learned early on that writing is the hardest part. If you write
something and you really want what you worked so hard at to come
to life, its really hard to find someone else to direct. I
can give you an example. No-one would have cast (actor/director)
Garry Marshall in Lost in America. If I had given it to Carl Reiner
to direct he would have done a fine job, but he wouldnt have
cast Garry as the casino pit boss. He would have put Jonathan Winters
as the pit boss. No-one would have put Rip Torn in Defending Your
Life. No-one else would have cast Debbie Reynolds in Mother. They
would have gone with Shirley MacLaine, or someone like that. But
those are the things that make one directors movies different
from another directors movies.
You have directed and acted in all of the films you have written,
with the exception of The Scout, which you didnt direct. Would
you consider directing a film and cast someone other than yourself
in the lead role?
I have written a new script that I wont be in because
there wasnt a part for me. The story didnt lend itself
to that. I didnt want to act in Lost in America. That was
my first experience trying to get a movie star. I remember sitting
and waiting for an answer from Bill Murray, and this was in 1983
when he was at the height of his fame. I got a call from his agent,
who said Are you ready? Bill loves it. This was October
of 1982 and he said Bill will be available in Christmas of
1984 and he wants to do it.-- So I thought Ill
just go and do it. I dont want to wait two years because I
will never want to make this movie. He had nine movies to
do before that because he was so popular.
Do you consider yourself to be the kind of person who needs to
be in control?
No, I dont consider myself to be a control freak because
I dont come from the place where its all about manipulation.
I was a lazy guy in school. I was never the one trying to manipulate
the other kids or trying to be president of six high school organizations.
I was never like that and I never started out doing that as a professional
person in this business. I started out in stand-up and I was making
up my own stuff, and I wasnt selling it to Rodney Dangerfield.
So early on I got used to knowing how to think of something and
carrying it through. I come from the place where I am thinking I
have put my blood on the pages. How do I get this represented correctly?
The answer came early in my professional life: you have to do it
yourself. Now this situation (My First Mister), is the opposite.
For better or worse I am here. And you stick with that choice. But
I am telling you, it begins with the writing. I have never directed
a movie that I didnt write because its just too difficult.
If that makes me a control freak, then maybe I am, but I dont
think that worrying about completing the vision that you started
with should bring with it the label control freak.
Speaking of this film, is it easy working as an actor for hire
when you are subject to the whims of a first-time director?
No. I didnt direct secretly while Christine was sleeping.
We would rehearse and I would say things that I thought were important
but I would just say them to her. I did tell them (Lahti and the
producers) that I thought the script was too sentimental but I understood
that you still had to tell the story of these two people and their
relationship. If someone grows an attachment to someone else then
that is a story. There are ways to do it well and there are ways
to make you feel nauseous. One of the ways to do it is if the emotion
isnt there, then the strings take over. That is what happens
a lot in movies. The actors arent doing it and the words arent
doing it so the musicians have to do it. But I was not standing
around and saying put the camera over here.
Is there a role that you havent played that you would take
even if you hadnt written it?
I would love to play a psychotic because I am not the guy
everyone has seen in that role and I really believe that the people
who are the really scary people are more like me than the people
who we think they look like. Whenever someone shoots up 18 people
he is described as seeming like a nice guy, so I know that I can
pull that off. But I know that I am not the first guy thought of
for the role, so I just want to do it so that I can say see,
there, I can do that.
What kind of director are you? Since you are in most of the scenes
in the movies, do you plan carefully or do you like a lot of coverage?
I shoot a lot. I dont do video playback because I would
rather shoot more than go and watch on a little television because
I dont think that shows me anything. I would rather shoot
more while everyone is there because I think its a very expensive
waste of time to have everyone standing around doing nothing. If
you are going for a very special camera move that you have to get,
then I would watch that back, but I dont think that with head
phones and a small screen you can really recognize performance.
There is too much pressure and people are all around you. If I am
acting in a scene with you I would direct it differently then if
I am not. I cant get the same view that I can if Im
watching, but I can get another view because I am in the boat with
you. So I can get a sense of how"
back to top
|